The Communist Reintroduction

The new whips have been cracked and it seems like harder than anyone could’ve forseen, at least so soon. The Uniparty changed management on the July 4th and in less time than you can even believe the UK’s existing problems have magnified to a scale not before believable to such a short period.

From memory it is hard to quite remember all the events happening up to this point (19th August) as so much has happened it beggars belief.

You have the:

  • Harehills Riots
  • Bangladeshi Riots in London
  • Manchester Airport Incident
  • Continuation of the Channel Boats
  • Southport Knife Attacks and Reactionary Protests
  • Continual reports of stabbings across the country

The last three issues in particular being major points in most of the recent troubles, with protests and riots kicking off because of the Southport incident. Rage over the Uniparties’ unwillingness to deal with the migrant issues has culminated in rocks being thrown at police, cars being flipped and migrant hotels set on fire, along with peaceful protests springing up across the country, but as of this point most of these have quietened down. The response from the Uniparty has to condemn everyone who took action as far-right, and they’ve continued on with this rhetoric further fanning flames and mis-labeling even people just having valid concerns. The Uniparty has doubled and tripled down its position to where just today Starmer has called the riots in Northern Ireland ‘racist’ in an effort to anger people and to potentially get them to do something rash.

The Uniparty is trying to whip up enough anger to cause an ‘incident’ that, with enough opposition from the general public, will allow them to continue restricting our individual freedoms. You can already see this with existing laws used against people posting (or even just sharing) social media posts. Some even for the crime of ‘racism’, this modern world it is unacceptable (a crime even) to be wrong. Curiously, (and currently I’ve heard no-one mention) the Uniparty announced they would release early some prisoners as to relieve pressure on the prison system (something never mentioned before on the campaign), but this was suspiciously just before any of these troubles started to begin, and now the people being arrested are going to have plenty of space to fit snuggly into a nice cell! Curious. One man was arrested and sentenced for anti-establishment speech on social media, since when was that a crime? What constitutes anti-establishment speech anyway? Am I currently in breech within these writings? Can the definition of anti-establishment speech change as to retroactively make criminals of people who have committed no crime?

The tactics of the Uniparty to stir-up hatred is as follows:

  • Ignore violence riots and crime from minority communities
  • Bring down the full force of the law against the push back
  • Label the dissenters with abhorrent labels as to ignore their plees and justify the Uniparties’ actions
  • Arrest them and force them to pled guilty under threat of severe punishment (the reason America has the 18th amendment)
  • Silence the dissonance through fear of arrest. (How dare you have wrong think!)

We are not seeing any push back from the Conservative opposition as there is no Conservative party, there is also no Labour party, there is only the Uniparty, and the Uniparty decides the play, damn what the serfs may believe! Change does not happen because democracy is a front, a nice little package for the peasants to pretend they have a say in how the system is run. Up-to Brexit the Uniparty never foresaw the peasants could vote for something so against Uniparty values, and ever since they have pretended to be on the side of the masses but their actions have been the opposite. The only difference now is that they are openly against them and are no longer wearing the veil, preferring to use intimidation now that the sly-slimy-weaselly option hasn’t worked.

Starmer sees himself as something of a Leninist figure, ends up looking like a Stalinist, but I would argue he looks more like a Ceaușescu, only with a frightened face and covered in glitter. At least most communist revolutions get started by impressive and immovable figures of history, but what we get is the market-brand imitation.